8:42 a.m. —

Radio news: a woman is for the “democratization of space”, making it accessible to far more than a few billionaires.

– Well, let’s see. And

the democratization of misery and slavery,
the disappearance of humans under climate disasters (democratization of extinction),
the continuation of decivilization of Misogynistic Traditional domination because “it was better before” until extinction follows,

is that progress?

9:24 a.m. —

A filmmaker: “allow yourself the Right to feel”. – yes and to be human.

9:28 a.m. —

Real estate, what’s it for?

To live? – Yes

To make money? – Useless.

11:46 a.m. —

The Inhuman Rulers want my skin to silence me?

You’ll know if I die before 130 years old.

In that case, plausible in decivilization of domination where killing the other is the basic ethical sport, you take back (any human takes back) the presidential program and put the Law of the 3 articles at the top of the Constitution. Afterwards, you continue as today, together at 8 billion. Except that you eliminate ALL inhumanity at a pace that suits you. Reminder: for the essentials, it’s urgent.

In summary, physically eliminating me is USELESS, except to accelerate the death of decivilization of domination.

(added on Fri 11/19/2021 10:18) No need to replace me, the candidacy works ALL by itself. We will not let bastards steal our common humanity and our future. (end of addition)

If the Inhuman Rulers can hold themselves back… It’s rare, but the stakes are high, which changes EVERYTHING. Indeed, that is THE question of the survival or not of decivilization of domination: “to be or not to be” as Bill (William Shakespeare 1564-1616) would have said.

So, if the Inhuman Rulers can hold themselves back, they may want to discuss. – OK, on one condition, their legitimacy. For that, it’s simple, they hold a referendum in their country, WITHOUT the usual ballot-stuffing under the control of UN observers: “human” or “inhuman”?

The Inhuman Rulers can talk /defend their inhuman point of view… only if THEIR population votes in majority for the inhuman. Otherwise, same thing as with us.

Remark: we can help them regain their humanity and burn their inhuman rags or melt their inhuman armor… Among humans ANYTHING is possible. It changes from “with AN inhuman, being human is impossible”.

1:45 p.m. —

Is being human simplistic? – Yes, “the human WITHOUT the inhuman”, we’ve said it all.

But the inhuman is also simplistic, “the inhuman WITHOUT the human”.

What is the difference then?

The human is ONLY positive.

The inhuman is ONLY negative.

Make your choice.

The human solves ALL problems.

The inhuman creates ALL problems.

How much does it cost? – NOTHING!

Is it difficult? – Just to put the right ballot in the box.

(added on Fri 11/19/2021 10:21) And to register on the electoral lists /electo-rant, if not registered. And to update the electo-rant lists if you’ve moved. And to participate in the search for the 500 elected signatures. Thank you for us 8 billion. It’s the Neolithic vote. You will be able to say “I voted human!”. (end of addition)

—

Tanguy Viel last night with Laure Adler on France Inter (the blue hour).

“If EVERYONE were ashamed. But some, ALL the dominant ones aren’t ashamed even though they should be because they speak for us without us realizing it sometimes.”

No need to be ashamed. It is decivilization of domination that makes us feel guilty to cement its power/domination.