end night —
What each person thinks, for themselves as well as for humanity, is vital, for themselves as well as for humanity.
What ONE person thinks, for themselves, imagining to be THE representative of Humanity, is small, reduced, reductive, restrictive… pathetic even for the naive, for themselves as well as for humanity.
Greatness is not in the smallness of the inhuman.
Greatness is in the human.
There is no greatness in the inhuman (the Greatness and prestigious Values of the inhuman are hoaxes).
If one, any one of the 8 billion, grows the human, it is the human adapted to the moment, present in the zeitgeist.
Hence the importance of being in benevolent interactivity / reciprocity.
Otherwise, we miss the human opportunity.
The best for humanity is always a better human.
The inhuman is always the worst inhuman because it kills the human.
Greatness is never in the small.
We always need someone smaller than ourselves, as Jean de La Fontaine says.
This is “the phrase of the day” for Christophe and Desirée’s anniversary (the first phrase at the very top)
Let’s each note our phrase of the day. All 8 billion of us.
And what if we discovered we had the same one?
It allows for rapprochement if we have the time to dig into this point or see where others come from and where they are going… a good start to a conversation.
Let’s make the best use of everyone’s abilities: no specialization, no slavery, not a few benefiting from the 8 billion. If everyone is willing.
Everyone is of equal importance (that’s equality) for the 8 billion.
Everyone is equally interactive. That’s interactivity / humanity of the 8 billion.
It’s not the number, the quantity that matters.
It’s the human, the quality that matters.
For oneself as for the 8 billion.
The power, mine as well as that of the 8 billion, can do NOTHING if it is not interactive and benevolent.
Each of the 8 billion? Lift them up and take them in my arms.
And not take each of the 8 billion and reduce them to inhumanity.
Let us inspire each other humanely.
When we are far away, in thought as in action, from each other, we only do foolish things. So, imagine AGAINST others.
—
Language elements = distancing / deception of others, as if they were naive.
If it were naive, the human would respond blow for blow to the inhuman.
If the inhuman responds blow for kindness and inhuman for human, then the inhuman is naive.
The inhuman is so naive
that it doesn’t realize it, because for it the others don’t exist, only He matters
that it doesn’t realize, doesn’t realize.
The inhuman is so naive
that it thinks that the other / others are so stupid that they don’t realize its inhumanity
and that it can benefit from it ad vitam æternam (already a few thousand years)
and that one would have to be stupid to deprive oneself of it
especially since there is no risk
that others become enlightened because they are so naive…
You can continue… The inhuman is so pathetic that it recidivates constantly, so there would be much to say. Why don’t novelists talk about it? There’s money to be made by pattering about the churning of inhumanities.
—
How stupid we reason when we reason partially / inhumanly, limited to a religion / domination…
We are 8 billion humans, for goodness’ sake!
Everyone has the right to change EVERYTHING to express the fact that it doesn’t hold up. And given what is happening with climate disasters, it would be time to “call on the public” to face the human life we have to lead. And not under the obscurantism of stupidity / inhumanity.
Everyone can explain why they do that. And what they would prefer to do.
And since we have been under the dictatorial regime of “crap for EVERYONE” for a few thousand years, maybe we could change the catastrophic inhuman world to a happy human life for 8 billion.
7:27 — France Culture – imam from Bordeaux
“Discovery of the unexpected” = discovery of the human in this inhuman world.
The inhuman, we unfortunately know too well because it is too stupid and too perfectly stupid-this time / constant.
7:34 —
The interest of each person’s expression is what we do TOGETHER in conclusion / synthesis.
Imagine if ONE ALONE had the RIGHT to express themselves and impose on others! No need to imagine, it’s decivilization of domination (this is where we are) for a few thousand years.
That’s why each of the 8 billion must express themselves.
To make one predominate over the other, it’s foolish. It’s decivilization of domination. In ALL its splendor.
And, moreover, it’s always the same, the Master of the world who imposes. Ridiculous!
Put the world in humanity, 8 billion exactly.
And not Master of the world, 8 billion exactly, in inhumanity. As today.
7:50 —
How can Az have such a gentle, reassuring, enhancing, happy contact?
A religion / civilization / enterprise / a State… only has interest if it is human, if it allows the human and if it allows each of the 8 billion to be human.
If that is not the case, trash bin! Absolutely NO interest.
11:15 —
It may be good, from your point of view, to propose / impose inhumanity again and again as a solution to inhumanity. But it would have to make sense. And continuing that makes no sense since it is the opposite direction of the only viable, reliable solution, the human.
Thank you for yielding the usurped place to the 8 billion humans for a few thousand years.
17:47 —
Let the Responsible party answer!
Why does the Responsible party do NOTHING for the 8 billion?
Why is the Responsible party not guilty of ANYTHING?
Why is the Responsible party not responsible for ANYTHING?
Why does the Responsible party never give an account of what he has done? Anyway, it’s nothing to make an account when you do NOTHING neither for others, nor with others. Is he even that lazy?