7:52 AM — end of the night
The inhuman is dangerous / lethal for the human. But furthermore, the inhuman is useless.
It’s the fly in the ointment (a fable by Jean de La Fontaine): the troublemaker who pretends to be essential when he prevents others from doing what they need to do / living what they need to live, their humanity.
The inhuman forces living inhumanity. It is the opposite of need.
Humans do not need to be led, controlled, judged, sanctioned, condemned, killed… by inhumanity.
And by humanity? The problem does not arise. Humans know what they have to do: be human.
The inhuman answers off-topic because it answers only questions that do not arise.
The inhuman wants everyone to know what they have to do that is inhuman and self-control, burn out, and commit suicide.
So, Justice, do your job: stop the inhuman stupidity, it has lasted too long.
Reminder, the goal of the inhuman is to eliminate ALL humans to be “at peace” on HIS deserted land, it’s HIS individual freedom.
“Individual freedoms.” And collective liberties?
The freedom to be human, for example?
Inhumans, what do you make of the freedom to be human? Huh?!
A guy from “the Republicans” on the radio:
“Unity” around Me-me-me, “gathering”… easy, just being human is enough.
It’s the one who wants others with him who divides humans, it’s the divider, the spanner in the works, the troublemaker. We don’t need him.
The 8 billion humans don’t need the inhumans to live. Quite the opposite.
The 8 billion humans need a world WITHOUT inhumanity, to live.
The 8 billion humans need to live / live human. Not live inhuman.
EVERYTHING is simple. It’s the inhuman that complicates EVERYTHING. The simpler we make it, the better.
Decivilization of domination is not only useless but dangerous for the 8 billion humans.
Through this blog, I prove it scientifically.
Inhumans, you who claim rationality, be rational, self-sabotage!
What do you think, captain?
The book passed by Élisabeth (“Terr2, when consciousness changes all the rules” by Sylvain Didelot, Atlantes editions) has a beautiful goal “Love”, except it formulates it inapplicable. Because this Love is elsewhere, in another “more evolved” world (less evolved for me). We are still with Sacred-False-God, even if he is no longer dominant, which is a great progress, but nevertheless insufficient since he holds ALL the keys. – False. He has ALL the keys that lock and none that open.
The correct formulation is “let’s love one another”.
Otherwise, there is a lack of interactivity and kindness.
Otherwise, crowds of good common-sense ideas, like agriculture, like “we all do what needs to be done” without being hindered by the inhuman (except there remains a hierarchy, which spoils everything).
But why depend on the happiness of humans from elsewhere when humans are simply EVERYTHING, all love for others (if there’s no inhuman to cause HIS mess).
And why not relation? That’s the human, the human is an interactive benevolent relationship.
Giving ALL relationships to a God is ridiculous because it’s hyper-restrictive / reductive, especially since he does NOTHING with it. And we pretend he is EVERYTHING and we are NOTHING. As a huge folly, it’s the best.
Let Whole God recognize that he doesn’t exist and stop preventing us from being human by saying we are worthless. We don’t need less than human, even with the deceptive label “Better”.
And then, major flaw, it’s complicated, thus twisted, hence it’s not reality.
Reality is simple, there are 8 billion humans on earth who want (we’ll see that with the vote in 2022) and need to live their humanity so rich, so beautiful, so good, so relational, so interactive, so kind…
We don’t need hassle, hierarchy, direction, domination, slavery, inhuman killings, and all these sorts of things. Thank you, we’ve already endured several thousand years.
It’s time to step into the fray (having been flattened by the steamroller) and give prominence to the human.
Decivilization of domination is not the cherry, but the anvil on the cake.
It’s disproportionate, like the repression of the peaceful Yellow Vests.
As if the black blocs were complicit with power to justify repression. Why hasn’t any been caught?
Like Hitler who set fire to the Reichstag.
Like the Japanese, disguised as Chinese, derailing a train (see in Tintin, The Blue Lotus).
(10:10 AM)
France Inter 9:15 AM – She’s talking about shame.
A word indicating we are in decivilization of domination.
Decivilization of domination shames its human victims.
10:48 AM —
By “countering” my words, Az gives me keys to open doors to come.
She allows me to anticipate problems, that’s the interaction.
We remain ourselves (otherwise, we bring nothing) especially if we are different and benevolent, like in a couple.
– OK, but no one will be in favor.
– That means we’ve been too long in decivilization of domination (a few thousand years).
But also, if we don’t believe in it, it’s that we don’t believe in humans, all the more since we can manage.
And especially that we believe only in the inhuman.
But the result of the vote will open EVERYONE’s eyes: those who don’t believe in the human. Like those who voted for the human without believing too much, given the uncertainty.
Malise believed in humanity. That’s her heroic spirit fighting for the human without fear and without reproach, even if she took hits refusing to give any.
We mustn’t be afraid and win with a smile.
We have to be crazy to want to win with and thanks to a smile. Let’s be crazy.
It’s stupid not to believe in humans. It means preferring the inhuman.
It’s not nice for women and children to be repudiated by the most inhuman.
Let’s change in 2022 this decivilization of domination crap that kills humans for a few thousand years. Out the fools = inhumans!
2:37 PM —
“We must respect the Authority, the Order, decivilization of domination, created by God…”
Sole concern: it’s the speech of the inhumans in place.
And the vocation, the goal, the ethics of inhumans is to take the place of humans and eliminate them.
Isn’t that problematic?
Why did the inhuman say “give me your power, I’ll take care of EVERYTHING” when it just wanted to loaf around and hence take care ONLY of itself.
Why bother deceiving people? You must be twisted, right? Inhumans, answer!
When one does not keep one’s word but only keeps others chained and digging their graves, nothing is legitimate because it’s the opposite of human need, to be human.
Dominants, supporters of Authority are ALL in bad faith.
Example, this morning: the blood donation doctor, a human a true one, tells me he can take my blood if the cardiologist writes a paper stating there’s no inconvenience for me to donate blood. Because a doctor deregistered me from the donation at St. Louis can only be annulled by a doctor other than the blood donation one (who is not allowed to reactivate me without proof).
The cardiologist refuses.
That’s decivilization of domination: hassle the world under the pretext of protection.
Because decivilization of domination “wants to cover” itself when there’s no risk (it’s like the banker who gives you an umbrella when the scorching sun melts everything and takes it back when it rains).
But decivilization of domination is not covered for climate disasters deliberately created to kill humans. The alibi doesn’t fly.
Decivilization of domination is also not covered for the slavery of the 8 billion with the inegalitarian economy. How does decivilization of domination plan to get through? We can directly attack: decivilization of domination doesn’t hold water.
Slavery, extermination of 8 billion humans and future generations, and the human species, isn’t that enough for Justice to seize the issue? MY law of the most inhuman is beyond THE-Law.
Just justice, do your job!
3:04 PM —
It’s getting better and better. Just formulating, saying what decivilization of domination does to us, and letting the 8 billion say it and the inhumans will go put on new clothes (empty suits = full of money).
Let’s be interactive: let’s appeal to the public, to the 8 billion. Let’s appeal to each other.
4:14 PM —
In decivilization of domination (a bias of inhumanity / stupidity), not making a difference
between inhuman and human (St. Paul mixes EVERYTHING)
is like not making a difference
between “fate of inhumans” and “fate of humans”
between macho and woman
between murderer and victim (under the pretext of humanity, Justice defends more the “Rights” of the murderer, thus defends the Right to kill, rather than rendering just Justice to the victim, who can be made to appear guilty, provocative… whose trauma is not considered unless the time limit is exceeded “Oh dear, there’s a limitation! It’s a shame, huh!” As for compensation, is it a word from the dictionary?
Between rapist and raped (Justice says “it’s word AGAINST word” “nothing proves there’s no consent”. Sure thing, buddy!)
7:53 PM —
Does it seem normal to you to have Authorities, hierarchies… when we’re told responsible adult?
The Law is indeed based on it, responsibility.
Do we talk about Authority, Order, hierarchy… in the Law texts? Where? We’re interested in knowing.