end night —

Last night read in Philocomix, Montaigne. Wise. Knows how to express himself. Knows how to put things into perspective. Knows how to analyze in real-time. Knows how to speak. Knows how to concretize immediately. Is human.

As a teenager, I didn’t read anything, except “War and Peace” two triple volumes in paperback.

In Tolkien’s “The Lord of the Rings,” I was dazzled by the world created by writing in its smallest aspects.

Montaigne did the same according to Philocomix.

Series are very popular.

It’s everyday life.

My blog is the same.

In shows, people complain that “young people” don’t read anymore. I’ve always heard it said, even as a teenager.

“Young people” would read if what they were given to read was interesting.

Literature (I say this because it’s the great literary types who complain the most about it), is more about form than substance, like Marie-Chantal. Therefore, uninteresting to me. Form hides substance, thus sabotages it. That’s why I don’t like poetry. Things must be said, especially inhumanity. The form of language elements is there to hide the non-existent human substance by relying on my foundation to better control/confine/destroy me. Form without substance is a criminal inhumanity. Like sex without love.

Montaigne: meet others. Interact. For the good of all, which is in the common and not in the Me-me-me like the cry of decivilization of domination.

The interest of existence is to be in a couple, to walk/live together holding hands. Because we are different. And the more we live together, the more we see the differences. Which makes it possible to put the accessory/secondary into perspective and strengthen the essential/the common/the human. By taking a step back or rising as the dominants say. Except they don’t want the other. They prefer the secondary/form and eliminate the essential/substance/human/subjective. Like the medicated in the name of the churning water reasoning-babble.

Decivilization of domination forgets the essential, the human. And kills it to clean up (like Marine Le Pen with foreign humans).

So much decivilization of domination wants to be serious/reasoning/scientific/inhuman to focus on the unequal economy, its ideal “augmented man,” who is augmented in inhumanity and impoverished in humanity. As long as it’s clean, keep only the useful, the robot and let’s call him “the augmented.” “Augmented man” is an imperfect name because there is human inside. Or “augmented inhuman,” that would be more accurate. How about calling it “Juste,” like in “The Dinner Game.”

Az “Everything has an end, that’s the problem.”

Sure, decivilization of domination says about humans/of the 8 billion humans: “Everything has an end.”

That’s why decivilization of domination hastens to clean up humans and strives to harm/to eliminate/to exterminate/to mourn them to finally find itself ALL ALONE on a deserted land, doing what IT WANTS. IT, the master of the world of only one inhuman, itself. (IT forgets that caught in its murderous momentum of a few thousand years, IT will kill itself if climate disasters haven’t eliminated it before. Qué con!)

—

As long as there is no answer or an unsatisfactory answer to a question, keep the question.

And if the loud sound of the waves was multiplied at the back and at the foot of the dune because of the wind as Az says. We have a cold northeast wind today.

12:07 —

Respecting decivilization of domination conventions that don’t suit us, for sure, puts us at odds.

But the worst, for 8 billion humans, would be to remain faithful to decivilization of domination. Instead of being human. It would be losing one’s humanity a little more. And for the 8 billion, 8 billion times more.

around 8:30 PM —

The blue hour

Please forward to Peter Brook

“The important: what touches the human, the meeting, is other than the ego, openness, inspired, living, not repeating but inventing new/rediscovering/lived as if for the first time, human connection beyond inhuman, there is what touches and what clutters (in religion for example), improvise, create, try without guilt, it’s not the form that matters, everything is in the vibration, it is living.”

The important, the only thing that interests the 8 billion humans, is the human. The human is made to live in a civilization of benevolent interactive human relationship. That’s the only thing that touches us.

Stop before it’s too late, from “our” decivilization of domination which has enslaved 8 billion humans for a few thousand years. That’s the only thing that keeps us from being human and human with others/hurts us/pits us AGAINST each other/kills us/wants to exterminate the human species in the medium term (a few generations).

I agree with Albert Jacquard (1925-2013) on these 2 points.

/

Best human regards,

Jean

Your message has been successfully sent, Tuesday 27/04/2021 at 11:08

[there’s a question I would gladly ask him but I will only do so if he manifests. I won’t bother/make him suffer with this:

how do you get out of losing your wife?

For mother, as we have things in common, I take over (deliberately without an “s”). That’s how human is immortal.

But for his wife (at the very beginning she asked me to die after her, to not leave her all alone), we do have things in common but that’s not the most important, even that couldn’t be done without crowds of common points. It’s not common at the same time. It’s opposed if you have your nose on a detail/different if you take a step back/2 aspects of the same reality if you are simply human accepted reciprocally. It’s living, really.

It’s like Stefan Zweig’s chess player, he plays (in prison, to not go mad) against himself without “one” being aware of what “the other” is cooking up. How is that possible outside of a novel?]