They talk about it at 1 PM on the news:
07/04/2021 – Le Figaro: The affront suffered by Ursula von der Leyen in Ankara is controversial
In a message published Wednesday evening, Charles Michel regretted “the differentiated or even diminished treatment” of the president of the Commission, who was sidelined during the meeting with Erdogan.
Ursula von der Leyen is right not to let the churlishness pass. Thanks to Erdogan for showing the world what inhumanity is. Thanks to him, the whole world will be able to adopt the Law of 3 Articles, Article 2: all inhumans are prohibited. Thanks again to Erdogan for this masterful example of sexism/misogyny. We do not thank him for the affront to Islam, whose Prophet could only prophesy thanks to his wife Khadija. Otherwise, Mohammed would have cried in vain in the desert.
2:27 PM —
What is abnormal is that decivilization of domination is made only for those who do not need it. And who complain because they are dissatisfied with it.
For the other 8 billion, it’s only harmful to humanity. Since it’s made to kill the human. Like Hitler with concentration camps. Except here it’s on a world scale. Economy of scale. Con centration.
2:51 PM —
It’s good (or not) to make a Law for every case.
But why doesn’t the State correct itself when there are disadvantages to its action? It must be logical.
That’s benevolent human interactivity.
That’s why every organization should be modifiable/correctable/refinable permanently by 8 billion humans. Otherwise, like today, it’s inhuman.
The worst system: a Single leader, the Master of the world. It’s the Master of nonsense. But watch out, he’s not responsible. And another layer of domination, let’s not be stingy with domination. Abundance of goods does not harm. Abundance of goods does not harm the 8 billion, but so far, only a few can say so. The others, they fend for themselves. It’s their fault if they are slaves. Of course!
4 PM —
I impose my will
. AGAINST my wife
. AGAINST my human interests.
It’s inhuman.
— on the bus
Stop requested
Stop at (Saint) Mandé
Why not better?
Why doesn’t “one” want a better world for humans?
Because inhumans want to profit.
Because inhumans want to profit from decivilization of domination, designed and created by or for them at the expense of humans, qualified/treated as sub-humans.
—
Aggressive voluntarily
or
defends against my aggression?
defends against my aggression, considering him different?
defends against my aggression, considering him different, to be feared?
defends against my aggression, considering him different, to be feared, an enemy?
It’s inhuman.
—
Inhuman:
– men are served first (French Revolutions), and women after… well, we’ll see later = never.
– the unequal economy is served first and the social/human after… well only in intention, as if we needed to kill humans to be able to do something for them.
—
Inhuman:
We do not accept what the other does/lives. It’s dominant.
We consider that inhuman and human are complementary. Like this, it justifies inhumanity. And moreover, it justifies inhuman power.
And as the inhuman kills the human…
The inhuman knows it. It’s its purpose.
I want the other to do as I do, good things.
I want the other to do as I say I do, good things.
I would accept if it were better than what I do.
There’s what is done and what is not done.
9:48 PM —
No rigid organization, even less hierarchical.
Because they are designed
. not to meet needs
. to break the human
. to impose the inhuman on the human.
The best organization: interactive, one-on-one, human to human and reciprocally.
Or all together, everyone expresses themselves, everyone human… there is no superior human knowledge, no expert on humanity. The best expert on humanity is the normal human = the human (the 8 billion who are treated as slaves by a few for a few thousand years without turning inhuman despite the pressing incentives by money, hierarchy, power to be inhuman… always as innovative in inhuman nonsense).
We are all human.
Each human can say “it’s better” or “it’s worse”.
So each human has the power to change/the power to be human (the power to be inhuman, we don’t care, we’re not stupid to that extent).
No principle without taming. Like this, principles will be human.
Maybe everything needs to be reviewed.
Life as a couple = reciprocal taming. It’s the most important, more than anything exterior.