night —
Considering the negative / the inhuman as normal, we destroy ourselves and others.
Decivilization of domination is criminal against humanity.
If it’s Me-me-me benefiting from the negative / the inhuman WITHOUT others, it kills others (decivilization of domination).
The other is erased / silent under domination
to not harm the other
to not become sick from the corrosive inhuman.
Not taking precautions against the negative / inhuman is criminal AGAINST humanity.
Harming the other is illegal because it’s a crime AGAINST humanity.
That decivilization of domination harms humanity / kills humanity for a few thousand years
therefore makes decivilization of domination even more illegal
shows the will / pleasure / sport of harming / recidivism even more criminal
traumatizes humanity even more.
It’s worse.
Decivilization of domination is the worst crime AGAINST humanity. Because it is systemic.
Decivilization of domination justifies itself and thus justifies its crime AGAINST humanity.
Decivilization of domination sanctifies itself and thus sanctifies its crime AGAINST humanity.
Decivilization of domination deifies itself and thus deifies its crime AGAINST humanity.
—
– Restraining myself to not harm others:
it’s good if I restrain my inhuman
it’s bad if I also restrain my humanity.
– In decivilization of domination, defending my humanity:
.is impossible through violence
because I’m using the inhuman
because the Rule of Law of the strongest, the Authority, the Order of the strongest give themselves the right to defend themselves.
– In decivilization of domination, defending my humanity:
is impossible through the violence of the Rule of Law, Authority, Order of the strongest, police, hierarchies, dominants… since they absolutely want to be inhuman and refuse to be human.
– In decivilization of domination, dominating the other is the easy solution to “have relationships” with others by stealing their life, their humanity by making them slaves, by dominating them.
It’s not competence, it’s human laziness.
10:10 —
We have something in common: we are patient, we are tolerant of the other.
Because the other is the only one like that, doing us as much good, in gratitude, because she deserves it, because she’s worth it.
Example: Az reproaches me for finishing the old bread and not enjoying the fresh bread I just went out to get. I’m not convivial, we can’t have the same tastes: I don’t take coffee, wine…
Shortly after Az reproaches me for not cutting her old bread which I’m eating. She should have reproached me for not cutting her fresh bread. Especially since, in general, she doesn’t want me to cut her bread in advance because she doesn’t know the number of slices, I make too many, she will serve herself.
And here’s the morning argument! Disarming. But this time I can laugh about it. We’ve advanced in taming.
Like the egg. Here it is well / perfect. A few days ago, I’m sure it’s the same that wasn’t cooked. But we can’t be sure of anything.
Az is alive. It’s never the same. That’s what’s human. And she doesn’t let herself be dismantled by my words. And she fortunately reproaches me for my domination, otherwise, I wouldn’t notice it after a few millennia of decivilization of domination.
11:05 —
If I realize I was dominant, by heritage / by education to decivilization of domination…
and I change to refuse to dominate, no problem
and I refuse to change, to change the structure that favors me, decivilization of domination, I become a qualified / competent in domination / prestigious enslaver.
Would I lose too much by changing? Would it be too stupid?
– not at all! Because the short-term future of decivilization of domination is the extermination of humanity. So I won’t “enjoy” it for long.
And for satisfaction, it’s doomed. No matter how much I consume human or humanity to excess, slavery, I will derive NO SATISFACTION. Even by recidivating galore / traumatizing galore. Not to mention the remorse. Because re-deaths lead to remorse.
Is it “unjust”? It’s normal. The inhuman has ALWAYS been the worst choice for a human.
Since it’s renouncing one’s humanity.
What are we if we are a human without humanity? NOTHING. Nothing = an inhuman. A nothing that KILLS humanity. And he’s proud of it. Pea brain (sorry pea!).
12:53 —
If we absolutely want to assign roles to women and men, since it’s the tradition in decivilization of domination for a few thousand years, we can say that women have fulfilled their role and men have done the opposite of what they had to do by attacking women instead of attacking decivilization of domination.
Indeed, humanity still exists after a few thousand years of destruction of human / humans by the few inhumans who wanted to be superior to others and put themselves in the power to harm, leading gullible men who were deluded by the pseudo-advantage of abusing / killing the only possible source of their happiness, the woman.
Jerks of decivilization of domination! Jerks of inhumans! Out with the humanicides, they have no place on earth! Because they take all the space from the 8 billion humans, mess up the earth, and exterminate humans.
15:00 —
France Inter – Lebanon 13:20?
Thank you to forward to the participants on Lebanon in the 13/14 with Bruno Duvic
The only possible future for Lebanon, as for the 8 billion humans on earth, is to change civilization: from decivilization of domination to the civilization of interactive benevolent human relation. Advice of Albert Jacquard (1925-2013).
/
Kind regards,
Jean
Your message has been sent at 15:16
France Inter – La Terre au Carré
Thank you to forward to Naomi Klein, Alice Brown Otter, Amira Odeh Quiñones
The only effective way to fight climate change is to change civilization: from decivilization of domination to the civilization of interactive benevolent human relation. Advice of Albert Jacquard (1925-2013).
/
Kind regards,
Jean
Your message has been sent at 15:17
after 20:00 —
France Inter – L’Heure Bleue by Laure Adler
Thank you to forward to Emmanuelle Béart
This “too much”, this “alive”, this “instinctive”, this “intelligence”… it’s human.
“Always responsible”. “Not yet free”. Free when others will be happy in a civilization of interactive benevolent human relation.
“I exist thanks to the man I live with, with my children”.
The human loves the human.
The “2 who make 1” is a dream of dominant=inhuman, with consent for better domination.
“Feminine desire remains unsettling”.
Feminine humanity remains unsettling.
Too bad, that’s where the human is.
Decivilization of domination kills women because they are creators / keepers / transmitters of humanity.
The male God is stupidity: the male is misogynistic out of fear of the human, out of desire to dominate the human, out of desire to be the only Human, he is only inhuman and destroys / exterminates humans and the 8 billion humans on earth.
The male does not give life, he takes it. He’s a fool.
The male God is the False-Dominant-Inhuman God. It has nothing to do with the Good God who created man in his image and who was reduced, by his devil of False God, to the state of a ladybug.
In summary, a God only has interest for humans if it is human. Therefore, a woman. The 8 billion humans do not need a Superior / Transcendent who is the inhuman.
And the 8 billion humans? Only question to ask on earth. Answer it only positively, in benevolent interaction. And not in inhumanity as for a few thousand years.
“When we are happy, we have a beautiful face”. Yes, as we age, we look more and more like what we are inside, they say.
/
Kind regards,
Jean
Your message was sent at 12:19 on Tuesday 18/05
news at 21:00? —
Gérald Darmanin “the anger of the police is legitimate”.
It is the power / the negative power over others, which is illegitimate because it is inhuman, like all “power” that harms.