12:46 —

Being myself and not someone else for the application.

It’s simpler.

And I don’t know how to do otherwise.

And it’s a snub to decivilization of domination that wants us to play a role, follow a protocol, adhere to inhumanity…

– Well, No! Exactly.

The human is human no matter what they do.

No need for fuss.

And anyone can step in at any time.

I speak for a human being.

And we can revisit it.

I count on each of the 8 billion to bring me back to human if I turn inhuman. It would be too stupid otherwise.

Humans will know what to do. Because humans are human.

The 8 billion humans will know what to do. Because the 8 billion humans are human.

19:19 —

“8 billion humans” is THE coherent and logical HUMAN solution that takes into account

the relationship between humans (Master-slave relationship in decivilization of domination)
human purpose (inhuman goal/vocation/ethic in decivilization of domination: “if there is only ONE left, I will be that one” signs the Master of the World)
human means (ALL means are inhuman in decivilization of domination)
the history of decivilization of domination and the religions/philosophies created there
the possibility of being human

[Impossible and reprehensible in decivilization of domination, due to crimes against inhumanity (= mortal sin)]:

helping other humans
helping victims in front of Justice
the possibility of being human
the possibility of doing anything human
(considered a crime against Inhuman Majesty in decivilization of domination), like lasting couple love
loving one’s spouse and children, others, the civilization of interactive benevolent human relationship, “let us love each other”
making humor with the dominants, for me humans like any other (April 1st to the DG: it’s VERY serious!)
removing money
refusing the incitement to break up one’s couple in the name of a relaxed freedom proud of harming others
refusing MY Law of the inhuman fittest
refusing decivilization of domination
refusing to win over others = wanting equality among ALL humans
refusing the misogyny inherent to decivilization of domination
refusing hierarchy = wanting everyone to be equal
refusing the unequal economy that makes 8 billion production and consumption slaves
refusing to be/struggle AGAINST others
refusing to replace the human with the inhuman
refusing to want more than others, because we are ALL equal
refusing the obligation of domination/obedience/killing/planned obsolescence of humanity/extermination of humanity
refusing to have to live in decivilization of domination which is the exact opposite/inverse of the world favorable to humans and destroys it knowingly and conscientiously for millennia and is soon to achieve its goal
refusing to consider the other as an enemy, since it is my ONLY possible friend
refusing to forget the humans, those who were since they passed on their humanity which is now ours and which we must pass on to future generations for an eternal humanity
refusing that society does not care about the 8 billion. It’s AGAINST nature
refusing the deification of the dominant
refusing the absolute rule of ALL inhuman “relationship” to fight AND lose AND not have the last word
refusing to consider ALL dominants as absolute God. Because we are all equal. All dominants, supposedly God, are False (of Death). Notably the one who expelled Adam and Eve from paradise on earth for eternity (stop the Neolithic in 2022)
… (add EVERYTHING you know, especially for having wanted to live it and not being able to)…

of the possible resolution of ALL the problems created by decivilization of domination (otherwise, in a few generations, there will be no more humanity on earth in decivilization of domination through climate disasters)
of the possible mending, of our common humanity, of the 8 billion humans, today totally discriminated/separated/isolated/opposed to each other when they are made to get along,
of the possible benevolent interaction (no relationship in decivilization of domination: compulsory one-way descending, under penalty of contravention/against human invention)
of the TOTAL change of atmosphere allowing possible common happiness, if EACH puts a little goodwill (impossible in decivilization of domination where the motto is from the beginning of the Neolithic “kill each other”,

in gross,

of ALL knowledge,
the know-how-to-be,
the beings,
to live together in interactive benevolence

“let us love each other”.

Decivilization of domination discredits itself if AGAINST legitimacy since illegal and mafioso since the beginning of the Neolithic: it is not an opinion, it is a fact.

It’s a scientific work, based on the experience of a human life in benevolent relationship with humans.

Decivilization of domination discredits itself if AGAINST humanity since inhuman since the beginning of the Neolithic, therefore totally incompetent in humanity that ALL inhumanity intentionally and willingly kills.

Decivilization of domination discredits itself if AGAINST claiming to be scientific since fraudulent since the beginning of the Neolithic.

EACH will be the SOLE judge of the good faith of “8 billion humans” and the bad faith of decivilization of domination since the beginning of the Neolithic.

(8:25 PM)

20:57 —

Az: we are not going to give his swimming pool to the neighbor. There are those who are jealous, even if you are not.

– We no longer reason the same in the human world:

we are no longer jealous (inhumanity) to be eliminated by the one who has this current tendency
we are not obliged to keep our pool/our property just for ourselves. We can evolve, at our own pace ESPECIALLY. Otherwise, it’s not human.

We tame each other and it changes EVERYTHING.

Reminder of the last sentence of the Christmas show about Marco Polo, offered by the Works Council:

“I saw an animal in the distance.

I approached. I saw it was a man.

I came closer. And I saw it was my brother.”

21:11 —

Ultimately, I advocate for a volunteer society: EVERYTHING for the human. NOTHING for the inhuman.

Inhumans, do you see a drawback in that?

Yes? So you admit the inhumanity of decivilization of domination. Thank you.
No? Then we agree. Let’s move to a benevolent interactive human relational civilization.

Religions can help, provided they do the same cleaning of inhumanities and change attitude, way of being… which changes EVERYTHING with nothing:

the good or bad habit,
the good or bad willingness,
the good or bad action,
taming each other,
exchanging humanities or inhumanities…

So do we choose to live in an inhuman society as today or do we want to change to a human society?

And if the human triumphs over the inhuman, it is voted, it is done.

Finally!

Now all that remains is to live human.

Hence satisfaction and soon happiness together.

See you soon.

22:15 —

The parents were different. The whole, WITHOUT INHUMANITY, was very balanced and supported each other. Even if there were clashes when the mother felt alone for such a task (children) and if the father endured the unbearable conditions of climate and working conditions.

WITHOUT INHUMANITY, EVERYTHING is possible.

So only remove the inhumanities that harm the humanity of the two.

And there it is, we are in a benevolent interactive human relational civilization.